State v. Duncan
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3229
Syllabus
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL — SPEEDY TRIAL: The trial court erred in granting defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint on constitutional speedy-trial grounds: the Barker factors weighed against a violation, despite the timely-filed motion, given the state's initial diligence, the lack of evidence linking the delay to the subsequent lack of diligence, and the absence of some particularized trial prejudice from the 13-month postaccusation delay.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-17· cited 2×
- State v. GribbinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-07· cited 2×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-12· cited 2×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-03· cited 1×
- State v. BowenOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-25· cited 1×
- State v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-05
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- State v. TriplettOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-11· cited 98×
- State v. Long (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-11-24· cited 69×
- State v. RiceOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-30· cited 19×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-03· cited 14×
- State v. PierceOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-12· cited 9×
- State v. MuhammadelOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-03· cited 9×
- State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-05· cited 5×
- State v. BushOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-31· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.