State v. Rentas
Citations
- 191 N.E.3d 547
- 2022 Ohio 2412
Syllabus
Speedy trial constitutional Barker factors prejudice findings. - Trial court did not err in granting defendant's motion to dismiss. After weighing the Barker factors, considering the entire record, and affording deference to the trial court's findings of fact, the state violated Rentas's constitutional right to a speedy trial. An almost forty-year delay is presumptively prejudicial the delay was primarily caused by the state failing to change the known incorrect information contained on the warrant the defendant asserted his right in a timely manner and the defendant demonstrated sufficient prejudice where missing or destroyed evidence, and the death of at least one witness, impaired his defense.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-20· cited 176×
- State v. TriplettOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-11· cited 98×
- State v. Long (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-11-24· cited 69×
- Henry Rayborn v. Charles Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, and Robert Abrams, New York State Attorney GeneralSecond Circuit· 1988-09-20· cited 63×
- State v. HullOhio Supreme Court· 2006-08-30· cited 55×
- State v. BurksOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-29· cited 30×
- State v. CraigOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-31· cited 30×
- State v. DuncanOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-16· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.