Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 1147

Syllabus

EVIDENCE — SEARCH AND SEIZURE — CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL — PROBABLE CAUSE — EVID.R. 612: The trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence of drugs and a firearm obtained during a search of defendant's residence pursuant to a search warrant where the affidavit supporting the warrant application failed to establish a nexus between the evidence of illegal drug activity that police sought to seize and the place they sought to search, and therefore, issuance of the search warrant was without a substantial basis for probable cause and violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [But see DISSENT: There was probable cause to issue the search warrant for defendant's residence because the affidavit in support of the warrant contained sufficient nexus linking the defendant's residence with the drug transactions with confidential informants that were verified by police officers.] Although the trial court erred under Evid.R. 612 in failing to preserve notes used to refresh a state's witness's recollection after it withheld the notes from review by defendant's counsel, the error was harmless regarding defendant's conviction for failing to comply with a signal of a police officer because the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence apart from the witness's testimony.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.