United States v. Climmie Jones, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Court reviews de novo the question of whether the district court violated Defendant’s rights under Booker
• holding the same because evidence that members of the investigating law-enforcement unit had “engaged in widespread misconduct” did not prejudice the defendant “[g]iven the overwhelming evidence of guilt”
• holding the same because evidence that members of the investigating law-enforcement unit had “engaged in widespread misconduct” did not prejudice the defendant “[g]iven the overwhelming evidence of guilt”
• holding the same because evidence that members of the investigating law-enforcement unit had “engaged in widespread misconduct” did not prejudice the defendant “[g]iven the overwhelming evidence of guilt”
• holding the same because evidence that members of the investigating law-enforcement unit had “engaged in widespread misconduct” did not prejudice the defendant “[g]iven the overwhelming evidence of guilt”
• holding the same because evidence that members of the investigating law-enforcement unit had “engaged in widespread misconduct” did not prejudice the defendant “[g]iven the overwhelming evidence of guilt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).