Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/14/2016
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 281 Or. App. 51
- 380 P.3d 1023
- 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1090
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that Turnidge abrogated cases applying the Johns framework to assess relevance of prior bad acts under theories other than the doctrine of chances
- “ [Fallowing Turnidge, evidence of‘hostile motive’ need not meet the Johns test.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duncan, Flynn, Lagesen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court· 1986-08-26· cited 242×
- State v. MoenOregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 189×
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 129×
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court· 2015-03-18· cited 115×
- State v. PittOregon Supreme Court· 2012-10-18· cited 80×
- State v. BrumbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-10· cited 20×
- State v. TenaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 10×
- State v. ClarkeDeschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-07· cited 10×
- State v. DavisClackamas County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-29· cited 4×
- State v. StubblefieldMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.