Skip to main content

State v. Espinoza

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 1807

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's sentence is contrary to law because his prior R.C. 2901.01(A)(9) offense-of-violence convictions render him ineligible for the mandated imprisonment at a non-ORDC facility under R.C. 2929.34. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that defendant-appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community-control sanctions.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.