State v. Espinoza
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1807
Syllabus
Defendant-appellant's sentence is contrary to law because his prior R.C. 2901.01(A)(9) offense-of-violence convictions render him ineligible for the mandated imprisonment at a non-ORDC facility under R.C. 2929.34. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that defendant-appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community-control sanctions.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-22· cited 276×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-24· cited 20×
- State v. BurdetteOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-30· cited 16×
- State v. HopeOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-26· cited 6×
- State v. PopeOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-04· cited 5×
- State v. ArthursOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-20· cited 4×
- State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-03· cited 3×
- State v. HawkOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.