Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/30/2019
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 5386
Syllabus
Appellant did not demonstrate that Having Weapons While Under Disability pursuant to R.C. 2923.13(A)(2) was unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. In addition, suppression of interrogation was properly denied by the trial court.
Judges: Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 3,086×
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 2,855×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 2,024×
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-26· cited 1,439×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 843×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- United States v. MarzzarellaThird Circuit· 2010-07-29· cited 357×
- Barrett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-01-13· cited 306×
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1993-08-11· cited 279×
- Kachalsky v. County of WestchesterSecond Circuit· 2012-11-27· cited 204×
- Harrold v. CollierOhio Supreme Court· 2005-10-10· cited 197×
- State v. LoweOhio Supreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 194×
- United States v. ReeseTenth Circuit· 2010-12-10· cited 181×
- United States v. MasciandaroFourth Circuit· 2011-03-24· cited 178×
- State v. CollierOhio Supreme Court· 1991-12-18· cited 176×
- State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 172×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.