United States v. Masciandaro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that magistrate court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to expunge his criminal records.
• observing that because the plaintiff’s as-applied challenge failed, “it necessarily follow[ed] that [the challenged regulation] ha[d] at least some constitutional applications”
• upholding the challenged law “under any elevated level of constitutional scrutiny”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).