Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/14/2012
State v. Gilbert
Citations
- 274 P.3d 223
- 248 Or. App. 657
- 2012 WL 839227
- 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that ORS 138.083(1)(a) states a legislatively created exception to the common-law rule that the trial court “loses jurisdiction” over the case once a defendant begins serving his or her sentence
- explaining that “a difference in the sentencing court’s oral ruling and the judgment is a Tactual error’ that constitutes an ‘erroneous term’” that a court may correct under ORS 138.083(1)(a)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-01-25· cited 15×
- State v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-11· cited 10×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-20· cited 9×
- State v. DonnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-26· cited 8×
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 5×
- State v. EsteyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.