Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 765 S.W.2d 780
  • 1988 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that double jeopardy bars convictions for both possession with intent to deliver and possession with intent to sell based upon the same evidence
  • holding that double jeopardy principles bar convictions for both possession with intent to deliver and possession with intent to sell based upon the same evidence
  • holding that double jeopardy bars convictions for both possession with intent to deliver and possession with intent to sell based upon the same evidence
  • concluding that double jeopardy barred convictions for possession with intent to sell and possession with intent to deliver when the convictions were supported by the same proof
  • holding that double jeopardy bars convictions for both possession with intent to sell and possession with intent to deliver where both convictions are based upon the same transaction
  • holding evidence that defendants had an unobstructed view of plaintiffs car was sufficient to support a finding that the defendants failed to keep a careful lookout

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Dwyer, Reid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.