Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 9/15/1993

State v. Richardson

Citations

875 S.W.2d 671
1993 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the trial court’s judgments are presumed correct in the absence of a transcript
holding that the evidence adduced at trial including evidence of ongoing animosity between the defendant and the victim was sufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction of attempted first degree murder
noting that in the absence of a complete record, the appellate court presumes that the trial court’s judgments were correct
noting that this court must presume a trial court’s ruling was correct with respect to an issue when the appellant fails to prepare an adequate record on appeal regarding that issue as is required by Tenn. R. App. P. 24(b)
noting that this court must presume a trial court’s ruling was correct with respect to an issue when the appellant fails to prepare an adequate record on appeal regarding that issue as is required by Tenn. R. App. P. 24(b)
refusing to find error because the record was incomplete and because the variance was not material or prejudicial when the discrepancy was regarding whether the aggravated assault occurred with a shotgun, as stated in the indictment, or with a handgun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wade, Birch, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.