Skip to main content

State v. Baker

Citations

  • 931 S.W.2d 232
  • 1996 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a “violation of the disciplinary rules . . . is not necessarily a valid basis for suppression of evidence”
  • defendant, who was represented by counsel, knowingly and voluntarily waived right to counsel by making several phone calls to sheriff’s deputies and their interview did not violate his right to counsel where his attorney did not prohibit officers from questioning defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ogle, Wade, Welles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.