Eighth Circuit· 11/4/1964
Nathaniel Vincent v. United States
Citations
- 337 F.2d 891
- 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3988
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant had not yet begun serving his sentence when he had not left courtroom although he was told to report to the marshal; trial court had authority to re-sentence him
- first sentence void because exceeded permissible punishment range
- first sentence void because exceeded permissible punishment range
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Oosterhout, Mehaffy, Davies
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.