Eighth Circuit· 11/4/1964
Nathaniel Vincent v. United States
Citations
- 337 F.2d 891
- 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3988
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant had not yet begun serving his sentence when he had not left courtroom although he was told to report to the marshal; trial court had authority to re-sentence him
- first sentence void because exceeded permissible punishment range
- first sentence void because exceeded permissible punishment range
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Oosterhout, Mehaffy, Davies
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-29· cited 429×
- State v. AguileraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-22· cited 209×
- William Spinelli v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1967-09-12· cited 172×
- United States v. William N. AndersonFourth Circuit· 1973-06-26· cited 158×
- United States v. Michael M. Busic, United States of America v. Anthony LaroccaThird Circuit· 1981-01-20· cited 158×
- United States v. Carl P. FogelD.C. Circuit· 1987-09-15· cited 117×
- United States v. Edward Ford, Robert Little, John Felix, Solomon Johnson, Phillip Usquiano, Marcus Thompson, E. Dene ArmstrongNinth Circuit· 1980-11-19· cited 104×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-09-23· cited 79×
- Ernest S. Borum v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-05-19· cited 76×
- James C. Dillard v. Lynn Bomar, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiarySixth Circuit· 1965-03-24· cited 73×
- William Caldwell v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1964-12-10· cited 68×
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-10-10· cited 68×
- United States v. John Robert JonesEleventh Circuit· 1983-12-19· cited 65×
- United States v. Everett W. Gross and L. Mary GrossEighth Circuit· 1969-10-30· cited 62×
- United States v. Harold DawsonNinth Circuit· 1975-05-02· cited 58×
- Michael v. Sciortino v. The Honorable Robert C. Zampano, United States District JudgeSecond Circuit· 1968-01-22· cited 56×
- State Ex Rel. Holmes v. SalinasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-02-14· cited 54×
- Kroll v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1970-11-02· cited 53×
- Harris v. StephensEighth Circuit· 1966-06-16· cited 51×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-26· cited 3,191×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 2,073×
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court· 1887-03-28· cited 814×
- United States v. BenzSupreme Court· 1931-01-05· cited 503×
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1926-10-29· cited 470×
- Salinger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1926-11-23· cited 147×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 147×
- Spriggs v. State Board of Law ExaminersSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 92×
- Barber v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1944-02-05· cited 58×
- J. A. Edwards & Co. v. Thompson Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 57×
- John Paul Schook v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1964-10-26· cited 49×
- United States Ex Rel. Bogish v. TeesThird Circuit· 1954-03-09· cited 41×
- Kenneth I. Lee v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1954-12-02· cited 38×
- George Trujillo v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1961-08-11· cited 35×
- Oxman v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1945-04-23· cited 35×
- Lem Pigg, Jr. v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1964-10-15· cited 31×
- Willard Barrett v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1959-10-16· cited 30×
- United States v. John Daniel ByarsSixth Circuit· 1961-05-30· cited 28×
- Joseph Francis Newman v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1964-06-26· cited 27×
Other cases named Nathaniel Vincent v. United States
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.