Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 856 P.2d 134
  • 253 Kan. 356
  • 1993 Kan. LEXIS 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he wording and scope of the two sections are identical for all practical purposes. If conduct is prohibited by one it is prohibited by the other.”
  • police could obtain consent to search by claiming they were looking for a third party
  • ‘[T]he wording and scope of the two sections are identical for all practical purposes. If conduct is prohibited by one it is prohibited by the other.’
  • police could obtain consent to search by claiming they were looking for a third party
  • “the wording and scope of the two sections are identical for all practical purposes. If conduct is prohibited by one it is prohibited by the other”
  • consent to warrantless search must be “knowing and voluntary” to comport with Fourth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Six, Holmes, Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.