Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/9/1998
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 508 S.E.2d 29
- 333 S.C. 62
- 1998 S.C. LEXIS 152
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, where appellant’s request to charge was denied on-the-record after an opportunity for discussion, Rule 20(b), SCRCrimP did not require appellant to renew his request at the conclusion of the charge in order to preserve the issue on appeal
- Although words alone may not constitute sufficient legal provocation, words accompanied by some overt, threatening act may be sufficient.
- issue is preserved for review where a party’s request to charge was denied on-the-record after an opportunity for discussion, and the party is not required to renew his request at the conclusion of the charge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ShulerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 104×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-02-22· cited 88×
- Keaton Ex Rel. Foster v. GREENVILLE HOSP.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-01· cited 75×
- State v. HugheySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-27· cited 68×
- State v. LocklairSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 49×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 25×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 20×
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 13×
- Gilchrist v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-04-25· cited 7×
- State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-09-05· cited 7×
- Dixon v. FordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-31· cited 4×
- Nedrow v. PruittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-13· cited 3×
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-12-15· cited 1×
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-01-02· cited 1×
- State v. BowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-08-07
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-08-04
- State v. Russell Levon JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-04-19
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rogers Ex Rel. Rogers v. Florence Printing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1958-12-10· cited 100×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-06-20· cited 79×
- State v. WhippleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-07-01· cited 50×
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-03-25· cited 46×
- State v. ByrdSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-08-19· cited 39×
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-11-10· cited 38×
- State v. LowrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-07-12· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.