Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/22/2005
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 609 S.E.2d 520
- 363 S.C. 53
- 2005 S.C. LEXIS 51
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting, in order to properly preserve an issue for appellate review, there must be a contemporaneous objection that is ruled upon by the trial court
- finding to preserve an issue for review there must be a contemporaneous objection that is ruled on by the lower court
- requiring a contemporaneous objection with specificity for the issue to be preserved
- noting, in order to properly preserve an issue for appellate review, there must be a contemporaneous objection that is ruled upon by the trial court, and if a party fails to properly object, he is procedurally barred from raising the issue on appeal
- exclusion of evidence is not reversible error if it could not reasonably have affected outcome of trial
- exclusion of evidence is not reversible error if it could not reasonably have affected outcome of trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett, Rawl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-10-03· cited 110×
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-07-17· cited 46×
- State v. SweetSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-11· cited 46×
- State v. KirtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-12-17· cited 32×
- State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-10· cited 29×
- State v. SheppardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-02-07· cited 28×
- State v. McEachernCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 26×
- State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-07-14· cited 17×
- State v. BowmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-11-28· cited 17×
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-07-27· cited 17×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-07-18· cited 16×
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-09· cited 12×
- Allegro, Inc. v. ScullyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-07-11· cited 12×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-08-14· cited 12×
- State v. BurkhartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-01-08· cited 11×
- Keene v. CNA Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-02-13· cited 9×
- State v. HellerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-06-13· cited 8×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-10-22· cited 7×
- State v. WhitnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-09-24· cited 6×
- Allegro, Inc. v. ScullyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-06-30· cited 6×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-15· cited 141×
- State v. ColfSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-04· cited 78×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-30· cited 33×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-07-01· cited 31×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-24· cited 31×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-09· cited 25×
- State v. PaulingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-22· cited 19×
- Priester v. CromerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-02· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.