Washington Supreme Court· 2/29/1996

State v. Deal

Citations

911 P.2d 996
128 Wash. 2d 693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A e that permissive inferences do not create a due process problem where the inference is not the sole proof of the element
mandatory presumptions violate due process if they relieve the State of the burden of proving an element of the offense
mandatory presumptions \run afoul of a defendant's due process rights if they serve to relieve the State of its obligation to prove all of the elements of the crime charged\
mandatory presumptions “run afoul of a defendant’s due process rights if they serve to relieve the State of its obligation to prove all of the elements of the crime charged”
mandatory presumptions violate due process if they relieve the State of the burden of proving an element of the offense
finding instructional error, but that it was harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Pekelis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.