Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 256 N.E.3d 312
  • 2024 Ohio 5098

Syllabus

Jury Instruction; affirmative defense; entrapment; evidence; harmless error; bribery; manifest weight. Trial court properly refused to provide a jury instruction on the affirmative defense of entrapment where the evidence did not support an entrapment defense. Trial court's decision not to instruct a witness to stop using the words \bribe\ or \bribery payment\ was not improper because the words \bribe\ and \bribery payment\ are commonly understood and did not amount to legal conclusions. Defendant's bribery convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where video evidence clearly showed the defendant accepting cash in exchange for fake police reports.

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.