United States v. Carl Henry Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \the constitutional considerations underlying the double jeopardy clause are wholly different from the premises of the Speedy Trial Act\ (quotation omitted)
• hospital patient’s statement that, if released, he would kill the President was a true threat
• “The line between the two forms of speech [incitement and true threats] may be difficult to draw in some instances . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).