Skip to main content

State v. Jimenez

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 651

Syllabus

Motion to vacate default judgment; Civ.R. 60(B) motion; lack of service; service of process; perfect service; rebuttable presumption; personal jurisdiction; void judgment; vacate judgment; abuse of discretion. Where the defendant-appellant provided a competent, credible, and uncontested sworn statement that demonstrated he was not served a forfeiture complaint pursuant to the civil rules, the defendant-appellant rebutted the presumption of service. Absent proper service of the complaint, the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant-appellant and, therefore, the court's grant of default judgment against the defendant-appellant was void and the trial court's subsequent denial of the defendant-appellant's motion to vacate the default judgment was an abuse of discretion.

Judges: Klatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.