State v. Jimenez
Citations
- 229 N.E.3d 1278
- 2023 Ohio 4317
Syllabus
Motion for default judgment civil forfeiture claim sua sponte dismissal of complaint. - Where state's complaint was pled in full compliance with R.C. 2981.05(D)(1)(a) through (c), which sets forth the requirements for a civil forfeiture action by the state regarding proceeds derived from criminal activity, and defendant did not answer, respond, or otherwise appear in response to the complaint, the trial court erred in denying the state's motion for default judgment because by failing to respond to the state's complaint or otherwise defend against it, defendant admitted the allegations of the complaint. Defendant's admissions were equivalent to proof of the allegations, and the state was not required to present evidence to prove the allegations. The trial court also erred in sua sponte dismissing the complaint where the complaint was not frivolous and did not demonstrate that the state could not succeed on the facts stated in the complaint, and the trial court did not give the parties an opportunity to respond to the trial court's intention to dismiss.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- Ohio Valley Radiology Associates, Inc. v. Ohio Valley Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court· 1986-12-24· cited 287×
- Klayman v. LuckOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-26· cited 19×
- Lopez v. QuezadaOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-04· cited 18×
- Hersh v. GrumerOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-29· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.