Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 4/10/2012

State v. Jensen

Citations

40 A.3d 771
2012 WL 1189896
2012 R.I. LEXIS 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the - 31 - existence of some inconsistencies between or among a witness or witnesses do not ipso facto render the testimony not credible
recognizing that “the presence of some inconsistencies between or among utterances of a witness or witnesses at different points in time does not ipso facto render the testimony unworthy of belief’
acknowledging that “the presence of some inconsistencies between or among utterances of a witness or witnesses at different points in time does not [by itself] render the testimony unworthy of belief”
stating that “the presence of some inconsistencies between or among utterances of a witness or witnesses at different points in time does not ipso facto render the testimony unworthy of belief’
acknowledging “that the presence of some inconsistencies between or -among utterances of a witness or witnesses at different points in time does not ipso facto render the testimony unworthy of belief’
“[T]he presence of some inconsistencies between or among utterances of a witness or witnesses at different points in time does not ipso facto render the testimony unworthy of belief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Suttell, Goldberg, Flaherty, Robinson, Indeglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.