Skip to main content

State v. Woods

Citations

  • 936 A.2d 195
  • 2007 R.I. LEXIS 116
  • 2007 WL 4179353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[a] credibility determination is particularly within the province of the factfinder” and that such a determination will “not be lightly questioned by this [C]ourt”
  • “We do not have the same vantage point as the presiding judge, and we are unable to assess the witness’ demeanor, tone of voice, and body language.”
  • deference to hearing justice for credibility determinations because this Court does not have the same vantage point to observe the “witness’ demeanor, tone of voice, and body language”
  • “We do not have the same vantage point as the presiding judge, and we are unable to assess the witness’ demeanor, tone of voice, and body language. Our perspective is limited to analyzing words printed on a black and white record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Goldberg, Flaherty, Suttell, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.