Arizona Supreme Court· 6/24/1986
State v. Jennings
Citations
- 722 P.2d 258
- 150 Ariz. 90
- 1986 Ariz. LEXIS 239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if drafter had intended language found in one provision to apply to related provision, it could have employed same language in both
- knowledge of revocation is required element of crime of driving under influence with revoked license
- section 28-446(B) presumes notice from mailing of revocation of license but permits defendant to show lack of knowledge regarding revocation
- if drafter had intended language found in one provision to apply to related provision, it could have employed same language in both
- defendant should have been allowed to try to show that he did not know his license was revoked
- due process afforded violators under the statute requiring mandatory revocation by the process of conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Manuel M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-04-11· cited 148×
- State v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-02· cited 61×
- State v. PettitNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-09-22· cited 60×
- State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-08-10· cited 59×
- Zamarripa v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court· 1987-12-31· cited 43×
- Reed v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-12-15· cited 35×
- Jolly v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-09-08· cited 31×
- State v. HeironimusSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-07-11· cited 19×
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-03-19· cited 17×
- State v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-12-02· cited 15×
- State v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-08· cited 13×
- Sniffin v. ClineWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-02-17· cited 13×
- State v. AgeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-08-02· cited 7×
- State v. CifelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-04-05· cited 7×
- State v. YazzieCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-09-10· cited 7×
- State v. ChurchCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-05-11· cited 6×
- State v. KeihnIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-11-21· cited 5×
- Yeargin v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-11-08· cited 4×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-06-17· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Roberto Rosadillo AguilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-03-19
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.