Skip to main content

State v. Jennings

Citations

  • 722 P.2d 258
  • 150 Ariz. 90
  • 1986 Ariz. LEXIS 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if drafter had intended language found in one provision to apply to related provision, it could have employed same language in both
  • knowledge of revocation is required element of crime of driving under influence with revoked license
  • section 28-446(B) presumes notice from mailing of revocation of license but permits defendant to show lack of knowledge regarding revocation
  • if drafter had intended language found in one provision to apply to related provision, it could have employed same language in both
  • defendant should have been allowed to try to show that he did not know his license was revoked
  • due process afforded violators under the statute requiring mandatory revocation by the process of conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.