Jolly v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that when an appellate court holds that different elements apply than those applied at trial, a remand for a new trial is appropriate
• stating that employing mandatory rebuttable presumptions in criminal cases “raises serious due process concerns precisely because these evidentiary devices can have the effect of relieving the prosecution of its constitutionally mandated burden of proof’
• jury instruction established a conclusive presumption where it used language such as \shall\
• Jury instruction established a conclusive presumption where it used language such as \shall\
• Knowledge of revocation is an element of this crime under Colorado statute.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).