State v. Jefferson
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2008
Syllabus
Discretionary fine; R.C. 2929.19(B)(5); present and future ability to pay; plain error; presentence-investigation report; ineffective assistance of counsel; failure to object. The trial court imposed a $5,000 fine as part of a criminal defendant's sentence. Prior to imposing the sentence, the trial court indicated that it had reviewed the presentence-investigation report. The report included information regarding the defendant's age, education, physical and mental health, and employment history. This information contained in the report is sufficient from which a trial court could reasonably conclude that Jefferson had the ability to pay the imposed fine. As such, it may be inferred that the trial court considered the defendant's present and future ability to pay the imposed fine. Defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the imposition of the fine.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. WillisOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-27· cited 16×
- State v. PetticrewOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-20· cited 13×
- State v. MosbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-31· cited 13×
- State v. CottoOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-21· cited 10×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-01· cited 3×
- State v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.