State v. Jarvis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• seeing “no support in the law” for claim that state cannot use same series of acts to prove more than one element of a crime
• “The same sequence of events can prove multiple elements of one crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Graydon
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2023-01-20· cited 8×
• State v. Jarvis
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-24· cited 6×

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Webb
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-26· cited 349×
• State v. Caron
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-05-10· cited 177×
• State v. Scales
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-06-30· cited 174×
• State v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-12· cited 128×
• State v. Ture
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-06-29· cited 127×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-09-07· cited 87×
• State v. Profit
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 74×
• State v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-01-15· cited 58×
• State v. Thaggard
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-01-20· cited 48×
• State v. Mattson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-11-08· cited 28×
• State v. Bowser
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-10· cited 23×
• State v. Schmidt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-06-22· cited 22×
• State v. Minton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-03-17· cited 18×
• State v. Reinke
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-10· cited 17×
• State v. Hince
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-12-15· cited 12×
• Powe v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-06-10· cited 9×
• State v. Bonn
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-09-15· cited 4×
• State v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-05-13· cited 3×