State v. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where identification was made five hours after the crime, “[t]hat relatively short amount of time does not weigh significantly against the admissibility of the identifications”
• “Clearly, under the test set forth in Classen, a procedure in which a witness is shown only a pair of joint suspects and asked to identify them is an unduly suggestive procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lawson/James
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-11-29· cited 143×
• State v. Hickman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-03-20· cited 1×
• State v. DELATORRE-VARGAS
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-07

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Manson v. Brathwaite
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
• State v. Classen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-13· cited 98×
• State v. Bush
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-05-02· cited 14×
• State v. Mackey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-08-05· cited 6×