Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/20/2013
State v. Hickman
Citations
- 255 Or. App. 688
- 298 P.3d 619
- 2013 WL 1150086
- 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 305
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Most significantly, the procedure was similar to, but significantly more suggestive than, a ‘showup,’ which is ‘inherently suggestive’ because the witness is always aware of whom police officers have targeted as a suspect.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. BotelhoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-03-05· cited 162×
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-20· cited 149×
- State v. Lawson/JamesOregon Supreme Court· 2012-11-29· cited 143×
- State v. ClassenOregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-13· cited 98×
- State v. WesleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-01-30· cited 11×
- State v. RectorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-19· cited 8×
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-01-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.