State v. Mackey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a similar argument, in part, “because the [identification] occurred within a few hours after the robbery”
• the witness noted the robbery suspect's facial scar, arm tattoo, light bearding, light reddish-blond hair, and type and color of clothing
• the witness noted the robbery suspect’s facial scar, arm tattoo, light bearding, light reddish-blond hair, and type and color of clothing
• photo throwdown was not suggestive where it showed “six white men of similar age with substantially similar hair color, style and length, facial structure and facial hair, wearing similar clothing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lawson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-15· cited 6×
• State v. James
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-01-05· cited 3×
• State v. Wight
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-08-24· cited 2×
• State v. DELATORRE-VARGAS
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-07

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Classen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-13· cited 98×
• State v. Maher
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-03-06· cited 7×
• State v. Wells
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-12· cited 7×