Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 12/20/2004
State v. James
Citations
- 608 S.E.2d 455
- 362 S.C. 557
- 2004 S.C. App. LEXIS 367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that although the defendant did not use the term \substantial circumstantial evidence\ in his directed verdict motion, he preserved this issue for appellate review by arguing there was insufficient evidence to support the elements of the charge against him
- \Possession of any amount of controlled substance coupled with sufficient indicia of intent to distribute will support a conviction for possession with intent to distribute.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Stilwell, Short
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chastain v. HiltabidleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-01-22· cited 36×
- State v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-02-21· cited 17×
- United States v. Bryan WilliamsFourth Circuit· 2021-05-13· cited 9×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-02-07· cited 5×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-11-19
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-07-07
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GasterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 178×
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-11-29· cited 144×
- State v. McHoneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-19· cited 100×
- State v. BurdetteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 87×
- State v. PinckneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-13· cited 61×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-07-06· cited 60×
- State v. KennerlyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-06-15· cited 58×
- State v. ByramSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-04-28· cited 57×
- State v. BuckmonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-11-13· cited 44×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-08-30· cited 41×
- Humbert v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-06-25· cited 34×
- State v. KennerlySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-12-20· cited 33×
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-01-02· cited 25×
- State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-04-30· cited 22×
- State v. CherryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-11-13· cited 13×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-22· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.