Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/20/1999

State v. Kennerly

Citations

  • 524 S.E.2d 837
  • 337 S.C. 617
  • 1999 S.C. LEXIS 215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]ssues not raised to the trial court in support of the directed verdict motion are not preserved for appellate review.”
  • “[I]ssues not raised to the trial court in support of [a] directed verdict motion are not preserved for appellate review.”
  • \A defendant cannot argue on appeal an issue in support of his directed verdict motion when the issue was not presented to the trial court below.\
  • \A defendant cannot argue on appeal an issue in support of his directed verdict motion when the issue was not presented to the trial court below.\
  • \The Brady disclosure rule is grounded in the defendant's fundamental right to a fair trial mandated by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.