State v. Jackson

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 1522

Syllabus

After conducting an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no issues with arguable merit for appellant to advance on appeal. The pro se claims raised by appellant alleging the violation of his right to a speedy trial and the trial court's failure to hold a hearing on his presentence motion to withdraw his no contest plea lack arguable merit. Judgment affirmed.