Court of Appeals of Arizona· 3/14/1972
State v. Jackson
Citations
- 494 P.2d 376
- 16 Ariz. App. 476
- 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A defendant is entitled to the presence and participation of his counsel at the hearing on revocation of probation and at the resulting imposition of sentence.”
- \A defendant is entitled to the presence and participation of his counsel at the hearing on revocation of probation and at the resulting imposition of sentence.\
- \A defendant is entitled to the presence and participation of his counsel at the hearing on revocation of probation and at the resulting imposition of sentence.\
- \A defendant is entitled to the presence and participation of his counsel at the hearing on revocation of probation and at the resulting imposition of sentence.\
- \A defendant is entitled to the presence and participation of [his or her] counsel at the hearing on revocation of probation and at the resulting imposition of sentence.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, Donofrio
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court· 1987-09-02· cited 80×
- State v. McClarityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-07-22· cited 10×
- State v. InglesArizona Supreme Court· 1974-01-25· cited 9×
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-06-04· cited 4×
- State v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-02-20· cited 3×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-11-12· cited 2×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,589×
- State v. DowthardArizona Supreme Court· 1962-07-10· cited 52×
- People v. Ronald W.(Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals· 1969-06-04· cited 44×
- State v. VeresCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-01-29· cited 23×
- State v. CrowderArizona Supreme Court· 1968-04-24· cited 23×
- State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court· 1972-02-02· cited 20×
- Pina v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1966-02-04· cited 13×
- State v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court· 1971-07-09· cited 12×
- State v. TritleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-09-21· cited 11×
- Johnson v. State Ex Rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-02-17· cited 9×
- State v. McFordCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-10-26· cited 9×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-06-07· cited 9×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-05-26· cited 9×
- State v. GoodloeArizona Supreme Court· 1971-04-07· cited 7×
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-05-14· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.