Skip to main content

State v. Sperry

Citations

  • 945 P.2d 546
  • 149 Or. App. 690
  • 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no double jeopardy (continued…
  • noting the “oft-reiterated principle that a trial court’s oral ruling is not binding until reduced to writing and, unless [the writing is] executed in open court, is not effective until filed with the clerk”
  • “[UJnder the circumstances presented here, the trial court could reconsider [its oral grant of a motion for a judgment of acquittal] and withdraw its ruling without violating” the Double Jeopardy Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, De Muniz Haselton, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.