Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/29/1986
State v. Jackson
Citations
- 730 P.2d 1361
- 46 Wash. App. 360
- 1986 Wash. App. LEXIS 3604
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Simply put, one’s reputation for moral decency is not pertinent to whether one has committed indecent liberties or incest.”
- “One’s reputation for sexual activity, or lack thereof, may have no correlation to one’s actual sexual conduct.”
- Division One, reputation for sexual morality and decency not pertinent reputation evidence, rejecting Harper
- proper to exclude a reputation of sexual decency in a statutory rape case
- objection to failure to hold hearing sufficient to preserve review
- “The crimes of indecent liberties and incest concern sexual activity, which is normally an intimate, private affair not known to the community. One’s reputation for sexual activity, or lack thereof, may have no correlation to one’s actual sexual conduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ringold, Scholfield, Swanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-07-16· cited 66×
- State v. KarpenskiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-12· cited 56×
- State v. LeavittWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-14· cited 55×
- City of Kennewick v. DayWashington Supreme Court· 2000-10-12· cited 55×
- State v. GriswoldCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-13· cited 33×
- State v. EakinsWashington Supreme Court· 1995-08-31· cited 30×
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-12· cited 29×
- State v. GrafSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-01-15· cited 26×
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-10-02· cited 23×
- State v. EnakievCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-08· cited 18×
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-06-17· cited 9×
- State of Washington v. Jacob Nathaniel CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-04-20· cited 6×
- Vigna v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-08-18· cited 6×
- State v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-07-02· cited 4×
- Vigna v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-07-31· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court· 1971-03-25· cited 1,211×
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court· 1984-11-26· cited 344×
- Ca 79-2963 Eloise Beard, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeff Beard, Deceased v. Roy Martin MitchellSeventh Circuit· 1979-08-07· cited 95×
- Perbello v. Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary CommissionSupreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 88×
- United States v. Medical Therapy Sciences, Inc., and Stanley BermanSecond Circuit· 1978-08-02· cited 35×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-12-23· cited 18×
- State v. DeachCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-05-13· cited 4×
- State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-03-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.