United States v. Medical Therapy Sciences, Inc., and Stanley Berman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is not every cross-examination that should trigger the authority of rule 608(a)’s provision for supporting character evidence.”
• \It is not every cross-examination that should trigger the authority of rule 608(a)'s provision for supporting character evidence.\
• character evidence allowed under Rule 608 to counter evidence “relating to the moral character“ of the witness
• where evidence as to bias suggests only that witness’s testimony may be slanted for reasons unrelated to general propensity for untruthfulness, character evidence is not relevant to meet such attack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).