State v. Enakiev

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of a person’s character for sexual propriety is admissible in a prosecution for harassment by touching the sexual or intimate parts of another
• concluding that evidence of the defendant’s character for sexual propriety was pertinent where defendant “was accused of harassment ‘by touching the sexual or intimate parts’ of another” without her consent
• notwithstanding concession of error, we review propriety of ruling for errors of law
• “[S]exual propriety is materially indistinguishable from the other examples of character traits * * * and is properly deemed a character trait.”
• evidence of a defendant's \sexual propriety\ is admissible as a pertinent trait in a prosecution for a sex crime
• evidence of defendant's character trait of sexual propriety relevant in prosecution for sex crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).