State v. Jack

Citations

• 258 N.E.3d 711
• 2024 Ohio 5594

Syllabus

The trial court committed plain error by not calculating and notifying appellant of the amount of jail-time credit to which he was entitled. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's Crim.R. 29 motion; there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction for domestic violence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the introduction of the video footage of the victim's statements to officers from a police officer's body camera pursuant to the excited utterance exception under Evid.R. 803(2). Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing on jail-time credit only.