State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the Supreme Court’s statutory interpretation of ORS 138.222(2)(d) in State v. Kephart, 320 Or 433, 443-45, 887 P2d 774 (1994)
• reviewing imposition of costs of investigation as a part of the defendant’s sentence
• reviewing imposition of costs of investigation as a part of the defendant's sentence
• ORS 138.222(2)(d) does not preclude review of portions of a sentence that are not part of a stipulated sentencing agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rusen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-05-12· cited 28×
• State v. Davis-McCoy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-30· cited 26×
• State v. Capri
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-29· cited 20×
• State v. Ivie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-30· cited 11×
• State v. Burch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-24· cited 5×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 4×
• State v. Flajole
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-02-15· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Adams
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 83×
• State v. Kephart
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-12-16· cited 54×
• State v. Kilborn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-19· cited 34×
• State v. Martin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-12-16· cited 24×
• State v. Reeves
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-04-26· cited 8×
• State v. Lake
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-12-01· cited 4×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-11-02· cited 1×