New Mexico Court of Appeals· 7/6/1993
State v. Ibarra
Citations
- 864 P.2d 302
- 116 N.M. 486
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that a motion to amend will be denied if the issue is 8 not viable
- observing that a party opposing 15 summary disposition is required to come forward and specifically point out errors in 16 fact and/or law
- noting that a party opposing summary 7 disposition is required to come forward and specifically point out errors in fact
- observing that 18 the “party opposing summary disposition is required to come forward and specifically 19 point out errors in fact and/or law”
- observing that a motion to amend will be denied 16 if the issue is not viable
- observing that a motion to 15 amend will be denied if the issue is not viable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Black, Chavez, Pickard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. ZamoraTenth Circuit· 2000-07-21· cited 123×
- State v. PlouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-01-15· cited 83×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2019-05-23· cited 34×
- State v. SimpsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-11-24· cited 31×
- Udall v. TownsendNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-10-01· cited 29×
- In the Interest of R.K.Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2002-05-31· cited 26×
- State v. BarreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-06-27· cited 18×
- State v. AdamoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2017-10-12· cited 16×
- Village of Angel Fire v. WheelerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-01-02· cited 6×
- State v. StephensonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-01-26· cited 6×
- Gomez v. Nielson's Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-04-18· cited 5×
- Wood v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1999-12-13· cited 5×
- In Re RKCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2002-05-31
- State v. StephensonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-11-18
- State v. AdamoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2017-08-31
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 20,800×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,488×
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-02-29· cited 839×
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1971-12-13· cited 727×
- Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 654×
- Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court· 1971-12-13· cited 487×
- State v. BoyerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-03-26· cited 401×
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-01-06· cited 335×
- State v. MooreNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-08-29· cited 331×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-08-10· cited 233×
- State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 79×
- State v. CalancheNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-01-10· cited 63×
- State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-04-17· cited 47×
- State v. SheldonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-03-27· cited 35×
- United States v. Peter MarinesTenth Circuit· 1976-05-11· cited 25×
- Proffitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-01-21· cited 24×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-08-26· cited 21×
- State v. BiancoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-07-07· cited 16×
- State v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Iowa· 1980-01-23· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.