Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/12/2025

State v. Hymer

Citations

2025 Ohio 1691

Syllabus

Defendant appeals convictions for burglary and violating a protection order. Defendant argued that the offenses should merge. Burglary and violating-a-protection-order offenses were not required to merge where each offense had a dissimilar import, i.e., each offense created separate and identifiable harms.

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Hoffman
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-03· cited 3×
State v. Bingle
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-09
State v. Freiburger
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-29

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

North Carolina v. Pearce
Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
Benton v. Maryland
Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
State v. Underwood
Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 491×
State v. Ruff
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-21· cited 17×
State v. Clowers
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-12· cited 13×
State v. Conrad
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-28· cited 8×
State v. Flack
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-23· cited 4×
State v. Chandler
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-08· cited 3×
State v. Herzner
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-06· cited 3×
State v. Thayer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-12· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.