State v. Conrad

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 5291

Syllabus

A defendant appeals his convictions for sexual imposition and contributing to the unruliness of a minor. The state did not deprive defendant of a fair trial where the state was permitted to amend the indictment with a narrower range of dates for the offense. The defendant had sufficient knowledge of the alleged dates of the offense to present his alibi defense. The court properly declined to merge the defendant's convictions where the offenses caused separate harms. The defendant's conviction for sexual imposition was supported by sufficient corroborating evidence. Both offenses were supported by the manifest weight of the evidence.