State v. Huskey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the three year delay in executing the warrant was not reasonable for an in-state defendant for purposes of a two-year limitation period
• leaving “for another day the question of whether the Emery rationale also applies to ORS 131.135”
• declining to address that alternative basis, when it was not addressed by the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Anglin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-08· cited 10×
• State v. Bigelow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-09· cited 8×
• State v. Hinkle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-21· cited 5×
• State v. Lindquist
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-03-17· cited 2×
• State v. Chase
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-16· cited 1×
• State v. Melecio
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Emery
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-03-24· cited 62×
• State v. Jackson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-10-04· cited 56×
• State v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-04-17· cited 23×
• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-08· cited 17×
• State v. Chinn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-21· cited 15×
• State v. Pirouzkar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-11· cited 12×