Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/17/2004
State v. Lindquist
Citations
- 192 Or. App. 498
- 86 P.3d 103
- 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 294
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the initiation of a probation violation proceed- ing does not commence a prosecution”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Brewer, Landau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LudwigOregon Supreme Court· 1959-10-07· cited 35×
- State v. EckleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-05-30· cited 32×
- Abbott v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-05· cited 26×
- State v. StuveCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 7×
- State v. HuskeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27· cited 7×
- Springfield Utility Board v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.