State v. Hinkle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that Barnes relied, in part, on “the fact that the defendant had ‘no actual notice of the indictment for three years and four months after the alleged offense’ ” in concluding that the delay was unreasonable
• delay of five years in serving an arrest warrant on the out-of-state defendant, who had notice of theft charges, was reasonable
• whether a delay is “reasonable” for purposes of ORS 131.135 is a totality of the circumstances inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Washington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-08· cited 12×
• State v. Anglin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-08· cited 10×
• State v. Berrellez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-15· cited 2×
• State v. Chase
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-16· cited 1×
• State v. Melecio
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Emery
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-03-24· cited 62×
• State v. Jackson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-10-04· cited 56×
• Abbott v. Baldwin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-05· cited 26×
• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-08· cited 17×
• State v. Pirouzkar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-11· cited 12×
• State v. Bigelow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-09· cited 8×
• State v. Huskey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27· cited 7×