Skip to main content

State v. Hurst

Citations

  • 688 N.E.2d 402
  • 1997 Ind. LEXIS 178
  • 1997 WL 680894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the statute for failing to yield the right-of-way does not have a scienter requirement
  • stating “[t]he one year time period should be extended because of defendant’s actions only if the defendant does something that is inconsistent with being brought to trial by the trial date or within one year.”
  • stating \[t]he one year time period should be extended because of defendant's actions only if the defendant does something that is inconsistent with being brought to trial by the trial date or within one year.\
  • citing, among others, Ursery, 518 U.S. at 288
  • citing, among others, Ursery, 518 U.S. at 288
  • traffic violations are considered civil proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selby, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.