Skip to main content

Cook v. State

Citations

  • 810 N.E.2d 1064
  • 2004 Ind. LEXIS 611
  • 2004 WL 1465540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s motions, which included scheduling conflicts of defendant’s counsel, were attributable to the defendant and extended the one- year limit
  • holding that defendant’s right under Ind. Criminal Rule 4(C) was not violated
  • holding that when “a defendant takes action which delays the proceeding, that time is chargeable to the defendant and extends the one-year time limit, regardless of whether a trial date has been set at the time or not”
  • holding all five of defendant's motions to continue the pre-trial conference were chargeable against the defendant, such that Criminal Rule 4(C) time limit had not expired
  • holding all five of defendant’s motions to continue the pre- trial conference were chargeable against the defendant, such that Criminal Rule 4(C) time limit had not expired
  • overruling Hurst and Morrison to the extent inconsistent; disapproving of Carr, Nance, Solomon, Harrington, and Miller

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.