Skip to main content

State v. Mott

Citations

  • 370 Or. 830
  • 527 P.3d 758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the court’s express rationale in deter- mining whether it abused its discretion
  • a published Court of Appeals decision remains precedential even if the appeal is later dismissed, “unless vacated”
  • although remand is typical, circumstances may justify a different choice
  • although remand is typical, circumstances may justify a different choice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.