New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1/29/1975

State v. Hummel

Citations

334 A.2d 52
132 N.J. Super. 412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that inclusion of the limiting charge in the court's instructions to the jury at the end of the case is sufficient
noting that the reason for the victim's delay was because her abuser threatened to put her away in a shelter if she spoke
noting that the reason for the victim's delay was because her abuser threatened to put her away in a shelter if she spoke
noting that the reason for the victim's delay was because her abuser threatened to put her away in a shelter if she spoke
allowing fresh complaint testimony three years after repeated assaults began, but just a few weeks after child left the foster home where she lived with the abuser, and victim also confided in a fellow victim shortly after the assaults began

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Carton, Crane and Kole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.